µðÁöÅÐ Àλó äµæ ½Ã ÈçÈ÷ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¿À·ù¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - CEREC ACÀÇ »ç·Ê Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
A study on Common Errors in Digital Impressions: (An Example of CEREC AC)
±èÀçÈ«, ±èÁöȯ, ±èÇý¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀçÈ« ( Kim Jae-Hong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°Ç°úÇаú
±èÁöȯ ( Kim Ji-Hwan ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç°úÇдëÇÐ Ä¡±â°øÇаú
±èÇý¿µ ( Kim Hae-Young ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç°úÇдëÇÐ Ä¡±â°øÇаú
KMID : 0362120110330030211
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was a quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression procedure using CEREC AC system.
Methods: Two-hundreds digital impression data comprising 174 inlays, 26 onlays by CEREC AC in-office CAD/CAM system were obtained from a dental clinic. One evaluator assessed errors of the digital impression data and divided into five categories of errors: inappropriate scanner positioning (ISP), improper handling with a scanner (IHS), irregular powder arrangement (IPA), improper cavity preparation (ICP), and insufficient scanned data (ISD).
Results: The most common errors were IPA(21%), and ISP and ISD were followed by 17% respectively. IHS was found in 14.5% of all digital impression data. ICP comprising only 6.5% was the rarest.
Conclusion: Most errors were due to inaccurate manipulation with an intraoral scanner or improper cavity preparation for scanning. A deliberate manipulation to prevent common errors mentioned may deliver an optimal result in the digital impression procedure.
Å°¿öµå
CEREC AC; dental restoration; digital impression; intraoral scanner
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸